Quick-Start Guide

Getting to know our UI and how to pick between vaults.

https://app.acryptos.com

Vault Comparisons

You see some great yields on our dapp: there's Single-Token vaults, and ACLM vaults - but you're not too sure which to pick. What are the risks involved? What tokens do you receive as APY? etc.

This will help you out. 👇

	Single-Token Vaults	ACLM - Stable Strategies	ACLM - Volatile Strategies
Built On	lending protocols, eg. Venus, Moonwell	CL DEXs, eg. UniswapV3, SushiV3	CL DEXs, eg. UniswapV3, SushiV3
APY Source	supply/borrow APY + lending platform tokens	swap fees generated from trading volume + *	swap fees generated from trading volume + *
Strategy Features	self-balancing for optimized highest APY	-single-sided deposits of either token. -auto range setting to ensure earning of swap fees -Tightened range for highest stable pair APY	-single-sided deposits of either token. -auto range setting to ensure earning of swap fees
Examples	-USDT -wstETH -BTC -LINK	-USDC-DAI -USDC-USDC.e -wstETH-WETH -cbETH-rETH -WBTC-tBTC	-MATIC-USDT -LINK-WETH -BTC-WETH -USDC-XSGD

More detailed comparisons here:

	Single-Token Vaults	ACLM - Stable Strategies	ACLM - Volatile Strategies
Risks	-lending protocol exploits -no IL risks	-CL DEX exploits -low chances of IL	-CL DEX exploits -high IL risks
Considerations	-exposure to 1 token -slower growth of tokens -high APY vaults less sustainable (as mainly coming from lending platform tokens)	-exposure to 2 tokens -higher APY, for relatively low IL risk -rewards sustainable via swap fees	-exposure to 2 tokens -highest APY, but gains easily negated by IL -rewards sustainable via swap fees
Rewards	auto-compounding into deposited tokens	auto-compounding into deposited tokens	auto-compounding into deposited tokens
Links	https://app.acryptos.com/vaults/single/	https://app.acryptos.com/aclm/	https://app.acryptos.com/aclm/

Notes:

• IL: impermanent loss

• CL: concentrated liquidity

• DEX: decentralized exchange

• LST: liquid staking tokens

• LRT: liquid restaking tokens

---

Categories

USD-A

A category of higher quality stablecoins vaults, built on USDC and its bridged counterparts.

• USDC (USD Coin by Circle)

  • see here for chains that USDC is native on

  • native USDC has 1:1 backing, transparent, verified reserves.

• USDC.e (bridged USDC on chains before USDC was natively available)

• axlUSDC (bridged USDC by Axelar)

• USDbC (bridged USDC by Base chain)

• xcUSDC (XCM protocol USDC on Polkadot parachains)

---

Examples:

Single-Token Vaults

• USDC on Venus (BSC)

• USDC.e on Lodestar (Arbitrum)

• USDbC on Moonwell (Base)

• xcUSDC on Moonwell (Moonbeam)

ACLM - Stable Strategies

• USDC.e / axlUSDC on UniswapV3 (Polygon)

• USDC.e / USDC on UniswapV3 (Optimism)

• USDbC / axlUSDC on SushiswapV3 (Base)

Link: https://app.acryptos.com/vaults/?a=usd-a

USD-B

BTC

ETH

ETH+

BNB

LP-A

A category of ACLM vaults, consisting of large marketcap token pairs.

• WMATIC

• WETH

• WBNB

• WBTC

• tBTC

• BTCB

• BTC.b

• OP

• ARB

IL is relatively lower than other pairs as prices for large marketcap tokens generally move in the same direction.

*Take note that IL may negate any gains, or result in losses on the intial deposit. Refer to the History Graph in the Advanced section of each vault to evaluate their past performance.

---

Examples:

ACLM - Volatile Strategies

• BTCB / WBNB on PancakeswapV3 (BSC)

• WETH / ARB on SushiswapV3 (Arbitrum)

• WETH / OP on UniswapV3 (Optimism)

• WMATIC / WBTC on UniswapV3 (Polygon)

• tBTC / WETH on UniswapV3 (Arbitrum)

Link: https://app.acryptos.com/vaults/?a=lp-a

LP-B

LP-C

LP-FIAT

---

Risks

DeFi risks are very high compared to traditional finance, ranging widely from market factors to contract exploits. Here are some risks for consideration along with possible mitigations. Factor in your own risk appetite when deciding on which vaults to deposit your tokens in.

Only put in funds you can afford to lose. Do not risk your life savings on DeFi.

General Smart Contract Risks

Smart contracts are vulnerable to exploits. These exploits can result in significant financial losses or other negative consequences. It's crucial to understand the risks involved and avoid interacting with contracts from untrusted sources.

ACryptoS has focused on safety and careful risk assessment since deployment in 2020. Multiple audits and a bug bounty serve to enhance the security. Read our blog here to understand what sets us apart.

Vaults - Underlying Protocol Risks

• our Single-Token vaults are built on top of lending protocols. They run the risk where the underlying protocols are exploited, and funds siphoned out via exploiters. We aim to filter out projects via thorough internal due diligence procedures, and try our best to build on safe credible protocols. Over the years since our deployment, despite our best efforts, there have been a few of these protocols exploited with funds unrecoverable (read: Atlantis, Channels, Sonne)

• our ACLM vaults are built on top of V3 Conc Liquidity DEXs. In order to minimize the risks of exploits on the underlying DEX, we aim to only build on stronger and battle-tested DEXs like Uniswap, Sushi, and Pancakeswap.

Stablecoin Depeg Risks

• protocols issuing USD stablecoins claim to be pegged to USD 1:1, but many smaller marketcap stablecoins are at a high risk of depegging. It may be due to the mechanics behind how the stablecoin is backed, or due to market sentiments resulting in sell-offs, etc.

• larger stablecoins like USDC, USDT, DAI, etc have lower depeg risks, though there have been multiple depegging issues over the years as well

LST/LRT Protocol Risks

• liquid staking tokens tend to be quite centralized, where user funds like ETH or BNB are held by the intermediary protocol, and staking is done on their back end.

• Risks involve protocol exploits, intentional draining of funds, or "depegging" of liquid staked tokens . Lack of liquidity might affect the unstaking of liquid tokens back to the native token as well.

• eg. rETH, wstETH, cbETH, stkBNB, ankrBNB, BNBx etc.

• please DYOR on how credible and transparent the staking protocols are, as well as how large the market of these tokens are

Bridged Token Risks

• it is essential to understand the difference between native tokens and bridged tokens on various chains. Bridged tokens are susceptible to risks and exploits of the bridging protocol itself.

• eg. USDC.e is a bridged token while USDC is the native token that is issued directly by Circle. The native USDC token can be redeemed 1:1 to USD via Circle.

• eg. Multichain bridge was exploited on multiple chains in 2023. Funds that were lost due to that incident has not been recovered since.

Wrapped Token Risks

Wrapped tokens, while offering convenience, can pose risks. The underlying asset's security and the wrapping platform's reliability are crucial factors. Be cautious of potential vulnerabilities and always research before investing in wrapped tokens.

eg. WBTC is wrapped by BitGo, cbBTC is wrapped by Coinbase etc.

Read more about risks and mitigations here.

---

Fees

• Withdrawal Fees: All vaults have a 0.1% withdrawal fee, calculated by the withdrawal amount.

• Performance Fees: already factored into the displayed APY. Full details can be found here.

Tips from the Samurai:

Based on the daily yield rate, try to withdraw only after withdrawal fee is covered. It will be all nett profits from thereon.

All fees go to ACryptoS Treasury, used for frequent buybacks of the $ACS token.

Treasury is owned by ACryptoS DAO ($ACS token holders), managed by a multisig.

• Treasury current holdings can be tracked on debank.

• More info on Governance here.

---

Next Steps 🚀

Interested to gain yields via our vaults? Check out this step-by-step visual guide.

Step-by-step Guide